The Bible is big,
according to the new Museum of the Bible. It’s also influential, easy to
understand, relevant to everyday life, and very American. The museum also
suggests that the Bible is not all that complex or challenging.
The museum
announces its presence with a text-emblazoned portal, three stories of the
first chapter of Genesis, presented as a massively resized version of the plates
used by the Gutenberg Bible’s printer. The entrance hall features enormous
overhead screens, on which an ever-changing rotation of evocative photographs signals
the technological thrust of the museum’s displays. The building’s glass-walled,
futuristic cap offers stunning views of the U.S. Capitol, just two blocks away.
Though founder
Steve Green deflected attention during a press conference to the institution’s
50,000 founding donors, the Museum of the Bible is his brainchild. Green, president
of Hobby Lobby, began collecting biblical artifacts in 2009, aiming to present
them to the public in a format that would garner wide attention. A committed
evangelical who has taken his turn in the culture wars, Green knows how to make
a political statement. His museum aims to educate and to inspire, but those brassy
yards of bas-relief text are also a way of claiming a permanent corner of the
public square for his people, the people of the Bible.
The museum’s six
floors include a 472-seat theater, a rooftop garden, two restaurants, and
nearly a dozen halls for temporary exhibitions. The permanent collection
includes a floor each devoted to the Bible’s history, narrative, and impact.
The impact floor is
easily the most powerful space of the museum. Divided into three sections, the
museum traces the influence of the Bible on American history, popular culture,
and contemporary people. The American history section, with views toward the
Capitol, provides an accurate and balanced description of the nation’s
religious history. The personal Bibles of William Bradford, Abraham Lincoln,
and Elvis are here, and one exhibit text describes the Bible’s understanding of
kingship as “an early chapter in the history of limited government and
constitutional thought.”
A series of
point-counterpoint displays focus on a series of social disputes in which the
Bible has played an important role. Samuel Seabury debates Benjamin Franklin
about the theological propriety of revolution, while other believers debate the
abolition of slavery and the place of religious instruction in public schools. The
survey sidelines contemporary squabbles, ending when baby boomers were still
adolescents.
The popular
culture section exhaustively traces the Bible’s influence on literature,
popular music, film, education, and medicine. A series of video screens feature
contemporary entrepreneurs, scientists, humanitarians — and prisoners — offering
testimony about how the Bible inspires and guides them. In another section,
dropdown screens feature people speaking about their favorite Bible verses and
times when the Bible has been helpful in facing personal crises. Many of the
speakers are thoughtful and compelling, providing powerful models for sharing
one’s faith.
The museum’s
evangelical thrust is also evident in its contemporary room, which features a
live-stream panoramic view of the Old City of Jerusalem, and a series of
screens flashing the latest references to the Bible on Twitter, as well as the
top Bible-focused web searches in countries across the world. Interactive
screens invite visitors to offer adjectives to describe the Bible and to create
Instagram-worthy placards of suitably uplifting texts (all from the NIV)
against lush natural backgrounds.
The Bible’s narrative is treated through a three-section
interactive experience. The center section is a village from the time of
Christ, with costumed reenactors performing everyday tasks amid items that
evoke Jesus’ parables. The New Testament is treated in an animated film, while
a longer, 40-minute, Disney-style experience leads visitors through about a
dozen stories from the Hebrew Bible, as the museum calls the Old Testament.
The narration of the film and the walk-through
experience avoid any particular interpretive spin. The New Testament film sees Jesus
entirely through the perspectives of different participants in the story
(Peter, Mary of Magdala, the centurion, and Paul).
The Hebrew Bible section is careful to focus only on
stories of deep importance to both Jews and Christians (there’s no sacrifice of
Isaac). It does not mention prophets who promised a coming Redeemer. The
closing scene of the spectacle is set in a darkened room lit by the many stars
of Abraham’s vision. It includes a glowingly illuminated Torah scroll, as though
the final goal and purpose of the Bible is really just the Bible.
The great weakness of the museum is its historical
collection. The curators have purchased a massive quantity of material in just
eight years, but most biblical artifacts and manuscripts of true significance
are in the collections of national museums, universities, and religious
institutions, which are loath to put them on the market.
The museum’s collection of antiquities is notably
thin, focused especially on a few scraps of the Dead Sea Scrolls, and those of
contested authenticity. Most of the large pieces in the biblical history
section are reproductions (though one must often consult the fine print to
notice). These have an apologetic aim, and include much of the archaeological
evidence corroborating details of biblical history.
A visiting exhibition from Jerusalem in the museum’s
basement, showcasing impressive discoveries from a single excavation in the
Valley of Elah, shows just how meager the assorted pot fragments and partial
stele in the permanent collection really are. The patristic-era and medieval
material is slightly better, with a few handsome illuminated manuscripts, but
all pale in quality to the few magnificent pieces from the Vatican Collection in
one of the temporary exhibition halls.
The collection of Reformation and modern-era material
is much stronger. Early English Bibles are represented in exhaustive detail,
some in very fine copies. A striking room contains copies of thousands of
contemporary Bibles, each in one of the world’s languages, with empty cases
representing each human language that lacks a Bible.
There is some compensation for the quality of the
artifacts in the extensive use of technology, a step that was probably
inevitable given that most of the collection consists of books, otherwise
viewable a page at a time. One interactive screen provides superb images of the
Lindisfarne Gospels (they remain firmly in the British Library’s display case).
Another allows the visitor to use multispectral
imaging to explore the different textual layers of one of the museum’s most
important ancient manuscripts, the Codex
Climaci Rescriptus, a palimpsest text originally from St. Catherine’s in
the Sinai. The document includes ten different texts (biblical, liturgical, and
devotional) that were written on the parchment over several centuries, each
scratched off before being overwritten by the next.
Slightly more unnerving are the full-size video
versions of John Wycliffe and Martin Luther who appear to state their case for personal
Bible reading from behind realistic alcoves cut into the museum wall.
The Bible Museum fails in its aim to discuss the
Bible’s place in history by sidelining its relationship to Christian worship. The
connection of the Bible to the liturgical year and the Eucharist are ignored. One
exhibit text suggests that medieval Christians largely printed biblical texts
in their missals and breviaries because copying full biblical texts was too
expensive, not considering that they might have thought prayer was an essential
part of experiencing the Bible rightly. While there is a fairly large
collection of Torah scroll covers, one searches in vain for a jeweled Gospel
book. The canon formation process, which was presided over by bishops and
placed major emphasis on liturgical use of texts, is ignored.
The museum also fails to account for the fact that
Christians have traditionally read the Bible differently than Jews, as a text
that finds its focus in the person and saving mission of Jesus Christ. Typology
in any form has been scrubbed from its presentation of the Old Testament. I
could not find a single artistic depiction of parallel stories from the two
Testaments and the apocrypha is ignored.
At numerous press
conferences, the Museum of the Bible’s officials have stressed their desire to
gather many perspectives, to present a nondirective, journalistic experience to
visitors. “We are not advocating for one faith perspective,” director Tony
Zeiss said.
There’s a good
deal of surface inclusivity. Important partnerships have clearly been formed with
Jewish scholars and religious leaders, who have a prominent presence in the
museum’s content. An Israeli rabbi will write a Torah scroll for several months
as an artist in residence.
But the true
convictions at play are not easily masked. Inevitably the Museum of the Bible reflects
the Bible as Steve Green has encountered it in his life. This is a museum of
the Bible as encountered in evangelical quiet time: personal, inspiring,
applicable — and probably a little political.
There’s nothing
wrong with that. Tens of millions of Christians experience the Bible in just
this way every day. But in the Bible’s long and complex history, this approach
is a minority report. The Museum of the Bible falls short in its failure to
cultivate a churchly imagination. This challenges its claims to tell an
authentic story about the founding text of the Christian faith.
No comments:
Post a Comment