they have
turned aside quickly out of the way which I commanded them. Exodus 34:7-8
Last
week, the University of Chicago’s Richard Thaler was awarded the Nobel Prize in
economics. Thaler will go down in
history as the man who slew homo
economicus.
If
it’s been awhile since Econ.101, you might not remember that homo economicus was that mysterious
creature that sprung fully formed from the brain of classical economists: the
person who made all his decisions based on careful calculation and enlightened
self-interest. Homo economicus would plan carefully for retirement by setting
aside savings early to benefit from compound interest. If the price of gasoline dropped, he would
use the discount in other areas of life instead of buying more expensive
gasoline. He will value his own possessions accurately and sell them if there
is an opportunity for gains.
Richard
Thaler suspected that many people were not quite so logical. So he started asking them, conducting
studies. What he found is that people
are predictably irrational about their economic decisions. They make different choices when they are
afraid, or when they have developed attachments. They maintain habits even when they are
destructive. They spring for the quick pleasure and ignore the long term need.
Human
beings are not as strong, wise or noble as economists had expected they were.
Those responsible for large scale finance in
government or commerce would be wise to pay take note and make proper tweaks to
connect with human nature as it actually is.[1] When asked how he planned to spend his
million dollars in prize money, he answered, “I will try to spend it as irrationally as possible.”
I
must confess that I’ve never read any of Dr. Thaler’s books, so I don’t know if
he makes use of historical case studies to prove his point. But today’s Old Testament lesson, the
incident of the golden calf in the wilderness, would be among the best examples
of human weakness and folly I know.
The
Israelites, after all, had seen the power of God at work in absolutely
spectacular ways. A few months before,
they had been bitterly oppressed slaves.
At the command of their leader, God had visited their taskmasters with a
series of ten astounding plagues. The
Egyptians had loaded them down with gold to hurry them on their way. The Red
Sea had been parted before them, and then it swallowed up their enemies, the
vanguard of the mightiest army on earth.
God had led them through the desert with cloud and fire. He fed them with miraculous food morning and
night.
For
some weeks they had traveled through the desert, and they arrived at Sinai, a
commanding mountain. Moses, their
leader, went up to meet with God, to receive instructions about what would be
next. In an awesome display of His glory,
God began to reveal the law to him, writing it with His finger on tables of
stone. Enlightened self-interest would
say, “cool your heels, children of Israel.
God has been watching over you so far.
Let’s see what he wants to do next.”
Ironically,
just as God had begun to outline the procedure for sin offerings, a din reached
the peak of the mountain. The people had
taken the gold of the Egyptians, melted it down, and fashioned into a golden
calf. A “young bull” is better- Apis,
the Egyptian symbol for strength.[2] Ignoring the God who had saved them, the
Israelites were calling out for help from the idol of their former taskmasters. Aaron, whom Moses had left in charge, tried
to whitewash a situation he clearly couldn’t control. The statue, he claimed, was really meant to
represent the Lord. Idolatry on the one
hand, sacrilege—the worship of the true God by improper means-on the other.[3] A sorry lot all round.
Why
did they do it? They were afraid, of course.
The Sinai is a desolate place, spooky and harsh. I visited once years ago, when a regular bus
was a very uncertain proposition, and I was glad to get on to Cairo after a few
days. Some might have thought that Moses
had abandoned them. They missed the
security of life back in Egypt—freedom can be painful sometimes. Maybe they longed for a bit of a thrill.
In
His dialogue with Moses, God says they are stiff-necked, which means that they
sinned deliberately. It’s clear that
Aaron knew better, and his explanation of things when Moses eventually came
storming down the mountain is among the most pathetic excuses in world
literature—“ I threw [the gold] into the fire,” he told Moses, ”and there came
out this calf." Surely, they all
knew that to confuse the gods of Egypt with their Redeemer was deeply perverse,
a shocking ingratitude.
God
says they must all perish, that His wrath, His righteous anger, will burn hot
against them. He had punished the
Egyptians for their cruelty and arrogance, and now He should justly do the same. They are your
people, God says to Moses, the ones you
have brought out of Egypt. Why don’t we
start again, God suggests—make a new Abraham out of you, the father of a new
nation. Maybe if they were all your own
children, Moses, they would get it right once and for all.
God
was laying out nothing less than what pure justice demanded. But was He not also testing this leader,
Moses, to understand what kind of man he was, and what kind of God he believed
himself to be serving.[4]
It’s
a moment of great dramatic tension, as we wait to hear how Moses will
answer. Moses reminds God that people
had only come from Egypt at God’s bidding and by His power. He reminds God of the promises He made to them
long before. “Turn from thy fierce wrath,” he begs,
“and repent of this evil against thy people.”
Moses never
denies that total destruction would be just.
When he goes down to them, he himself is full of anger. But he doesn’t see much use in starting over
again. What Moses doesn’t say directly
but clearly implies is that this is just how it is for the sons and daughters
of Adam. They are people after all,
prone to sin, foolish, weak and broken. Destroy
them all, start over again, and in a generation they’d make all the same
mistakes. God must be merciful, for His
people cannot bear much righteousness.
My favorite
Psalm says it this way:
Yea, like as a father pitieth his own children *
even
so is the Lord merciful unto them that fear him.
For he
knoweth whereof we are made *
he
remembereth that we are but dust.[5]
God
chooses to be merciful to His people, despite their foolishness and sin,
remembering that we are but dust. It is
a choice he would make time and time again.
But choosing to be merciful there, at Sinai, just as He was giving the
law reveals a great irony. God is giving
a law which He knows this people will be unable to keep. He is commanding sacrifices that will not
really change their hearts or reconcile them to Him. The law God gives to Israel is marked as
provisional from the very beginning, a beta version that will need more work
before it can be released confidently to the whole world.[6]
God
chose that day in Sinai to be merciful, because he had a fuller purpose in mind. Even then He knew that He would one day
establish among us a Presence closer at hand.
He would send One of us who would obey as we could not, One who by His
faithfulness would take on the punishment rightly earned by us. God’s mercy at Sinai points ahead to a
reckoning, an awful cost yet to be paid by the strength of God’s love.
Catherine
of Siena traced God’s purposes for this stiff-necked race: “Rebels that we
were,” she wrote, “we declared war on your mercy, and became your enemies. But stirred by the same fire that made you
create us, you decided to give this warring human race a way of reconciliation,
bringing great peace out of our war. So
you gave your only begotten Son…He became our justice, taking on himself the
punishment for our injustices. He offered
the obedience you required of him, in clothing him with our human nature…O
depth of love, what heart could keep from breaking at the sight of your
greatness descending to the lowliness of our humanity.[7]”
Rebels
that we were—Israel, yes, but each of us as well. Each
of us has bowed to our own version of the golden calf in our moment of weakness,
folly and impatience. Each of us has failed
to the trust God who has been so good to us.
Irrational human nature can’t get along on its
own. That’s what good doctor Thaler
prescribed for homo economicus. There must, he said, be “nudges,” good habits
plotted carefully into the structure of things, defaults to help us make easily
the decisions we would hesitate to make on our own.
We
have such nudges also. Here you are for one
of the most important of them: the weekly hour in God’s House, to hear His
word, to receive grace anew in absolution and sacrament. We have prayer, the buoy of the sinking
soul. We call on God to be with us in
our folly, to reshape our desires, to turn our hearts. And He pours out His good Spirit anew, even
on sinners like us. He has drawn near to
us and bound us to Himself. He bid us be
wise with His knowledge and strong with His power. He knows what we are and yet loves us through
it all.
[1]
Appelbaum, Binyamin. “Nobel in Economics is Awarded to Richard
Thaler.” The New York Times, 9
Oct. 2017, https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/09/business/nobel-economics-richard-thaler.html
[2]
White, Thomas Joseph. Exodus. The Brazos Theological Commentary on
Scripture. Grand Rapids: Brazos, 265.
[3]
White, ibid. 266.
[4]
Stuart, Douglas K. Exodus, New
American Bible Commentary. Nashville: B
& H, 2006, 672.
[5]
Ps. 103:13-14.
[6]
White, ibid. 268.
[7]
Dialogue, 13.
Great message Mark. The humility of Moses, at least at this point, unlike his sin in Numbers 20. You make a great point. Moses knew starting over would only result in the same problem in one generation. Homo Economicus! How prone we are like them in our own rebellion. How great is the Mercy of God, especially at the cross!
ReplyDelete