Tuesday, November 28, 2017

Not Changing the World

“Then the righteous will answer him, ‘Lord, when did we see thee hungry and feed thee, or thirsty and give thee drink?”  St. Matthew 25:37

“Love God.  Love your neighbor.  Change the World.”  For some years this was the official tagline of the Episcopal Church, the slogan you would see on the denominational website, the mantra repeated by the Presiding Bishop at official gatherings.  Under the leadership of our current presiding bishop, Michael Curry, the new tagline is, “The Jesus Movement.” But the “change the world” language does get trotted out from time to time.  It has an enduring to stir people’s hearts and to get them thinking big about the implications of following Jesus Christ in the life of the Church.

Some of you will know that Fr. Mac and I do a fair amount of writing for The Living Church’s Covenant blog, and this week there was a compelling article by our friend Dan Martins, the Bishop of Springfield, about this slogan, “Love God.  Love your neighbor.  Change the World.[1]”  Bishops Martins acknowledged, “It’s catchy, it’s memorable, and you can’t really argue with it without sounding hopelessly curmudgeonly.” 


But Bishop Martins also challenged at least one common interpretation of the idea that the church’s responsibility is to “change the world.”  Public worship, evangelism, prayer and Bible study, forming the faith of young people—all the other things that the church does--according to this interpretation, are ultimately instrumental means towards the ultimate goal of social change.  According this view, he suggests, “the prize on which we are to keep our collective eye is a completely just society, yielding peace throughout the world.”

This view lines up pretty squarely with the agenda of the Social Gospel, an important movement within American Protestantism that began in the mid-nineteenth century.  Social Gospel leaders brought rhetorical power, social influence and the tools of scientific planning to tackle a series of deep public injustices.  They founded thousands of relief organizations and lobbied for new laws, with the New Testament in one hand and reams of social statistics in the other.  They had enormous confidence about the ability of religiously motivated people to make true and lasting change.  Indeed, many of the relief programs in our great cities that continue to feed the hungry, clothe the naked and house the homeless can trace their origins to an earnest Congregationalist or Methodist minister (occasionally even an Episcopalian) fired with the energy of the Social Gospel.

William Blake’s “Jerusalem” functioned as an anthem for the movement in England, and gives a good taste of its universal spirit.  It famously closed:
I will not cease from Mental Fight,
Nor shall my Sword sleep in my hand:
Till we have built Jerusalem,
In Englands green & pleasant Land.

The breathless passion for righting deep-seated injustice and ancient wrongs is quite moving (especially when sung to Sir Hubert Parry’s stirring tune). You can sense in it the determination and the confidence that made some great saints and gave to many more a sense of common purpose in a deeply changing society.

Could it, though, be a bit too confident and determined?  Could it be a bit too certain of having the plans figured out already, with just the right amount of skill and strength to do it all in a generation? 

The theological temptation of the Social Gospel is to slide too easily into Pelagianism, the false belief that human character and human society can be perfected by our effort alone, without any need for God’s grace.  Pelagianism is arrogant, overestimating human skill and integrity.  It also never quite reaches its goals, running aground on the hard rocks of folly, sin and death.  The Social Gospel was deeply influential in many places, but Denver, Seattle and Milwaukee never quite became the new Jerusalem. 

Today’s Gospel lesson was a great favorite among the leaders of the Social Gospel movement.  In this well-known parable of the Last Judgment, Christ highly praises services rendered to the poor and needy.  He stands in the long tradition of Israel’s prophets.  In messages like today’s Old Testament lesson, they emphasized that those given authority would be judged on the basis of their just treatment of the poor and vulnerable.

Jesus tells us here that He stands in the midst of our dealings with those who suffer.  When we feed the hungry, clothe the naked, visit the sick we are ministering directly to Him whom we love above all.  This kind of work expresses the new life of loving generosity that He has established among His people.  He promises the greatest possible reward for it—an honorable place at His right hand, and eternal life in His kingdom.

But what strikes me as I read the parable is how surprised the sheep are when the great king singles them out for commendation.  “When did we see you?” they ask Him.  Were you really there when we were feeding the hungry and giving the homeless a place to sleep and visiting the poor fellow in prison?  These sheep, they don’t really sound like people who are confident that they know how to change the world.  If they have already drafted the plans for the new Jerusalem and resolved not to “cease from mental fight,” they don’t show it very clearly. 

Did they think they were changing the world in those acts of mercy?  Somehow, I doubt it, at least most of the time.  They are humble tasks, after all.  Visiting the sick, clothing the naked—these are simple duties, likely to go completely unnoticed by the world.  In his sermon on the passage, St. John Chrysostom calls them “light things.”  Because the tasks are expected of all, they are easy to fulfill.  The great preacher added, “He said not, "I was in prison," and ye did not set me free, but, and "ye visited me not.  Also, His hunger required no costly dainties, but necessary food. [2]

Perhaps also they are surprised, because there’s no great sense of accomplishment that comes with these kinds of tasks.  You go to a sick person’s bed, and there’s so little you can actually do.  You feed a homeless person one day, but as you walk away, you can guess he’ll be waiting for another meal tomorrow.  I’ve known a few people who have given themselves completely to the kind of ministry that Jesus praises in this parable.  Most days, they really don’t feel like they are changing the world.  They are sometimes discouraged and often exhausted.  They run up against mental illness and racism,  a culture of generational poverty, habitual cruelty, corrupted social systems: the kinds of things well-meaning people can’t master. 

But they They can be kind.  They can soothe the pain a bit.  But they don’t claim to a solution to hand.  And maybe that’s a good thing.  Bishop Martins put it this way: “We’re more like a Tylenol to the world’s headache, taking the edge off the pain, than we are a surgical procedure that permanently fixes the problem. God will do the heavy lifting, in his way and in his time.”

For me, at least, that gets the balance right.  Jesus is a great king.  He began to change the world when He broke the power of sin and death at the Cross.  And he will transform and fulfill the world completely, when He returns in His royal power at the end of time.  In his kingdom, there is perfect justice and all are sustained with what they need.  He will cleanse the world of sickness and corruption and we will all live in peace and joy.  He promises a Jerusalem, but its founder and builder is God,[3] and it descends from heaven,[4] our true eternal home.

That’s not to say that we shouldn’t work to enact good policies, and that God doesn’t bless good works undertaken to help people turn their lives around.  There are good theological reasons for faith-based advocacy.  Some of you may have power to change some aspect of the life of the world in a significant way, and God surely expects you to use that power faithfully.

But remember that the work Jesus praises most highly praises are those ways we administer “Tylenol to the world’s headaches.”  He wants us to get our hands dirty, to turn up even when it seems pointless, to step into that uncomfortable but sacred place alongside another in his or her suffering.  It doesn’t feel like changing the world.  But He is there, ready to meet us, our King present in “the least of these.” 



[1] Martins, Daniel.  “Outcome Based Discipleship.”  Covenant, 20 Nov. 2017.  https://livingchurch.org/covenant/2017/11/20/outcome-based-discipleship/
[2] Qtd. In Thomas Aquinas, Catena Aurea, Matt. 25, Lectio 3.
[3] Heb. 11:10.
[4] Rev. 21:10.

No comments:

Post a Comment